NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1706 vs 435
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 263
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2332
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1706 vs 435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 2332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 2332 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1706 | 435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 263 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4935 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | GK107 | Scrapper |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 963 | 964 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,303 million |
| Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8410G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
