NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 500 Watt
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 8681
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 752
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 vs 29 April 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 8681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 752 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 8.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 2432
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 2x 5,733 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
Texture fill rate | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 2432 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,733 gflops vs 8,186 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 | 8681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Vesuvius |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 | 29 April 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 250 | 203 |
Price now | $379.99 | $1,099.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | 11.14 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 2x 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 307 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 640 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |