NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 12.72 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 336 vs 48
- 6.1x better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 367
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 38
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 June 2011 vs 14 August 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec vs 12.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 336 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 vs 367 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1598 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 657
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 657
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1598 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 vs 657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 vs 657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 | 367 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 38 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | 2376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 | 2376 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF114 | G94 |
| Launch date | 28 June 2011 | 14 August 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1353 | 1528 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | |
| Price now | $99.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 530 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 336 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec | 12.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-HE |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1598 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6620G
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 610
