NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 382
- 13.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 35
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 10 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 vs 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 35 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 266.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 3242
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 3242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 3242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 | 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 35 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3285 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK106 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 10 September 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $67 |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | 1459 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 193 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
