NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 2721
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 424
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 6674
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 18.462
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 427.88
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.899
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 23.742
- Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 817
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 1,244 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 vs 2721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 vs 6674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 vs 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 vs 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 vs 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 vs 23.742 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 vs 817 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 134 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 936x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.965 vs 51.009
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 3426
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 3242
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 3426
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 3242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 vs 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 3242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 | 2721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 | 6674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $1,269 |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | 866 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 810 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 5616 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
