NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 810 MHz
Environ 21% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 51.84 GTexel / s
Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 2721
Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 424
Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 versus 6674
Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 versus 18.462
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 versus 427.88
Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.899
Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 versus 23.742
Environ 35% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 versus 817

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	980 MHz versus 810 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	62.7 billion / sec versus 51.84 GTexel / s
Performance á point flottant	1,585 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	3388 versus 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	465 versus 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	9482 versus 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.21 versus 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	561.43 versus 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.026 versus 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.868 versus 23.742
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1106 versus 817

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Environ 68% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 134 Watt
Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
936x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5616 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.965 versus 51.009
Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 versus 3426
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 versus 3242
Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 versus 3426
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 versus 3242

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt versus 134 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	3 GB versus 2 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	5616 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	61.965 versus 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3798 versus 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3651 versus 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3321 versus 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3798 versus 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3651 versus 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3321 versus 3242

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3388

2721

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

465

424

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9482

6674

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.21

18.462

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

561.43

427.88

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.026

1.899

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.868

23.742

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.009

61.965

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3426

3798

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3642

3651

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3242

3321

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3426

3798

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3642

3651

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3242

3321

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1106

817

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	3388	2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	465	424
Geekbench - OpenCL	9482	6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.21	18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	561.43	427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.026	1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.868	23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	51.009	61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3426	3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642	3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3242	3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3426	3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642	3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3242	3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1106	817

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK106	GK106
Date de sortie	26 March 2013	1 March 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$169	$1,269
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	810	866
Genre	Desktop	Workstation
Prix maintenant		$225.65
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		14.81
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1033 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	980 MHz	810 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	768
Performance á point flottant	1,585 gflops	1,244 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Température maximale du GPU	97 °C
Pipelines	768	768
Taux de remplissage de la texture	62.7 billion / sec	51.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	134 Watt	80 Watt
Compte de transistor	2,540 million	2,540 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	9.5" (24.1 cm)	241 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	One 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	3 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	144.2 GB / s	134.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	192 Bit	192 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	6.0 GB/s	5616 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA