NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 22.4 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1051
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 283
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 304.279
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2179
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3170
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2179
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3170
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 22.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 716.8 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1051 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 304.279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 3170 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 230x more memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 4493
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 12.582
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 1.254
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 18.386
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 23.499
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 vs 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 vs 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 vs 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 vs 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 vs 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 1051 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 283 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 7525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 20.161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 304.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 1.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 30.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 96.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Oland |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $89 |
| Place in performance rating | 1003 | 1087 |
| Price now | $144.81 | $78.34 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | 27.62 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 22.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | N / A |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
