NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 134 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3242
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 26 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 33.9 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 95% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6.0 GB/s vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1749
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 368
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 4493
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 12.582
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 364.463
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.254
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 18.386
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.009 vs 23.499
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2663
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3478
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2663
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3478
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 545
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 33.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 vs 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 vs 3478 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 vs 545 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 3388 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 9482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3242 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK106 | GK106 |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 26 March 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $169 |
Place in performance rating | 1003 | 810 |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 980 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | 768 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 62.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 134 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | One 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI |