NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 384 vs 64
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 176 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 402
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 57
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2917
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2917
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 768 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 402 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2917 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2917 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 320x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 402 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 57 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 2917 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 2917 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G94 |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $489 |
| Place in performance rating | 1003 | 1429 |
| Price now | $144.81 | $186.29 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | 4.05 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 550 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 768 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
