NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 38% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 60 Watt
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 614
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 256
  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 1550
  • 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 4.874
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 259.769
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.487
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 14.033
  • Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 57.396
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1389
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1389
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 5 January 2012
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 vs 614
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 vs 256
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 vs 1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 vs 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 297.631 vs 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.427 vs 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.363 vs 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125 vs 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970 vs 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970 vs 1389

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2490
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3329
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2490
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3329
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 480 vs 384
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2724 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2724 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2220
614
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
480
256
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6869
1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.112
4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
297.631
259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.427
0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.363
14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
99.125
57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2970
1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2970
1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
3355
Name NVIDIA Quadro K620 AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 614
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 256
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 297.631 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.427 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.363 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2490 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2490 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 702

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K620 AMD Radeon HD 7570

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale 2
Code name GM107 Turks
Launch date 22 July 2014 5 January 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $189.89
Place in performance rating 953 1254
Price now $189.93
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 15.23

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 624 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 480
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit DDR3, GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management