NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 614
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 256
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 1550
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 4.874
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 259.769
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.487
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 14.033
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 57.396
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1389
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 vs 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 vs 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 vs 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1389 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3329
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3329
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3329 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 256 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Turks |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 1254 |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |