NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 454
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 56
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3304
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 2490
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 2490
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 2490 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3304 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
| Code name | GM107 | G92 |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 21 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 953 | 1063 |
| Price now | $189.93 | $103.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K620 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIATesla K10
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIATesla K20c
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8410G IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
