NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
- Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 2135
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 475
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 6108
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 97.126
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2918
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1813
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3309
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2918
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1813
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3309
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 vs 655
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 793.3 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 2135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 vs 655 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 22.112
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 297.631
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 1.427
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 15.363
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24.79 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 vs 15.363 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 2135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 24.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 27.096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 | 655 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 979 |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |