NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 84.186
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 25 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 84.186 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 5.2x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 2220
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 480
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 6869
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 22.112
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 297.631
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 1.427
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 15.363
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 2970
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3329
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 2970
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3329
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 702
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 15.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 702 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 4803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 14261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 84.186 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 6927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 6927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 25 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $249 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 576 |
Price now | $189.93 | $249.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | 23.69 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |