NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 625 MHz
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 80% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 62 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 947
Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 303
Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 3879
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 10.229
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 258.26
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.885
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 13.688
5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 19.02
Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1600
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1682
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2668
Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1600
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1682
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2668

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 24 December 2010
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 625 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 62 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2220 vs 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	480 vs 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869 vs 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112 vs 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631 vs 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427 vs 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363 vs 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125 vs 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz

Texture fill rate	20 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2220

947

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

480

303

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6869

3879

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.112

10.229

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

297.631

258.26

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.427

0.885

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.363

13.688

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

99.125

19.02

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2970

1600

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2490

1682

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

2668

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2970

1600

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2490

1682

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

2668

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K620	NVIDIA Quadro 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	2220	947
PassMark - G2D Mark	480	303
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869	3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112	10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631	258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427	0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363	13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125	19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970	1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490	1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970	1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490	1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	2668
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	702

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K620	NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF106
Launch date	22 July 2014	24 December 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.89	$599
Place in performance rating	953	1287
Price now	$189.93	$87.99
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	15.23	17.65
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	625 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt	62 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	160 mm	178 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		41.6 GB / s
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management