NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 475 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
• Around 77% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 142 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1476
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 382
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 5013
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 13.345
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 39.651
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2079
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2079

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 306.122 vs 297.631
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.552 vs 1.427
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.453 vs 15.363
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 2490
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3329
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 2490
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2220 1476
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	480 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6869 5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.112 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	297.631 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.427 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.363 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.125 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2970 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2490 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2970 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2490 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3350

Compare specifications (specs)