NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 475 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 638.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1282
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 271
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 5212
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 21.42
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 81.823
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1413
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 865
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1254
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1413
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 865
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1254
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 638.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 1282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 271 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 5212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 21.42 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 81.823 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 865 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 865 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1254 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 297.631
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 vs 1.427
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 15.363
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 26.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.724 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.068 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.126 vs 15.363 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 1282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 271 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 5212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 21.42 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 738.724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 2.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 33.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 81.823 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 1413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 865 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 1413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 865 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 1254 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF104 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 1303 |
Price now | $189.93 | $111.99 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | 19.30 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 26.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |