NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 475 MHz
  • Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
  • Around 35% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 638.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1282
  • Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 271
  • Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 5212
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 21.42
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 81.823
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1413
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 865
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1254
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1413
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 865
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1254
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 475 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 336
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 638.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 vs 1282
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 vs 271
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 vs 5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 vs 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125 vs 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970 vs 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2490 vs 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970 vs 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2490 vs 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 vs 1254

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

  • Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
  • Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 297.631
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 vs 1.427
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 15.363
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 26.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 738.724 vs 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.068 vs 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 33.126 vs 15.363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2220
1282
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
480
271
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6869
5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.112
21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
297.631
738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.427
2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.363
33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
99.125
81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2970
1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2970
1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
1254
Name NVIDIA Quadro K620 NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 1282
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 271
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 297.631 738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.427 2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.363 33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2490 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2490 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 1254
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 702

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K620 NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi
Code name GM107 GF104
Launch date 22 July 2014 22 February 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $189.89 $449
Place in performance rating 953 1303
Price now $189.93 $111.99
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 15.23 19.30

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 475 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 638.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 336
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 26.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 2500 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management