NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 640 MHz
  • Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 526
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 232
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 2100
  • 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 5.617
  • Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 185.752
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.526
  • Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 9.023
  • 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 16.137
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 899
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1255
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2037
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 899
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1255
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2037
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 13 December 2010
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 640 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 vs 526
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 vs 232
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 vs 2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 vs 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 297.631 vs 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.427 vs 0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.363 vs 9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125 vs 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970 vs 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2490 vs 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 vs 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970 vs 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2490 vs 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 vs 2037

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

  • Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 41 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 41 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2220
526
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
480
232
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6869
2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.112
5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
297.631
185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.427
0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.363
9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
99.125
16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2970
899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2970
899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
2037
Name NVIDIA Quadro K620 NVIDIA Quadro 600
PassMark - G3D Mark 2220 526
PassMark - G2D Mark 480 232
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 297.631 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.427 0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.363 9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2490 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2490 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 2037
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 702

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K620 NVIDIA Quadro 600

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi
Code name GM107 GF108
Launch date 22 July 2014 13 December 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $189.89 $179
Place in performance rating 953 1471
Price now $189.93 $299
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 15.23 2.80

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 640 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 245.76 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 10.24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit DDR3
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management