NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 640 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 526
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 232
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 2100
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 5.617
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 185.752
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.526
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 9.023
- 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 16.137
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 899
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1255
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2037
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 899
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1255
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2037
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 13 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 245.76 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 526 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 2100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 5.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 vs 185.752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 vs 0.526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 vs 9.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 16.137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2037 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 41 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 526 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 2100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 5.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 185.752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 0.526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 9.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 16.137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 2037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 2037 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 13 December 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 1471 |
Price now | $189.93 | $299 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | 2.80 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 640 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 245.76 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 10.24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |