NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 95% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 424
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 6674
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 18.462
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 61.965
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2721 vs 2220
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 427.88 vs 297.631
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.899 vs 1.427
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.742 vs 15.363
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2970
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2490
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2970
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2490
- Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 817 vs 702
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2721 vs 2220 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 vs 15.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 2490 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 vs 702 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 2721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK106 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 1 March 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $1,269 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 866 |
Price now | $189.93 | $225.65 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | 14.81 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5616 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |