NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 12.3x more texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- 8.6x more pipelines: 3840 vs 448
- 12.3x better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 2988 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 2704
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 455
- 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 9850
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 vs 24.377
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1916.09 vs 793.755
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 2.66
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 545.751 vs 90.839
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 3501
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3689
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3335
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 3501
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3689
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 vs 10 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 2988 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 2704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 9850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 vs 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 vs 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 vs 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 vs 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.891 vs 31.471
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 vs 31.471 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | 2704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 | 9850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GP102 | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 October 2016 | 10 December 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | $4,399 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 769 |
Price now | $4,403.52 | $332.21 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | 12.86 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory type | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |