NVIDIA Quadro P6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 9 mois plus tard
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 574 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 394.8 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- 8.6x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 448
- 12.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,634 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 6 GB
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 2988 MHz
- 5.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 versus 2704
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 versus 455
- 6.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 versus 9850
- 8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 versus 24.377
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1916.09 versus 793.755
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 versus 2.66
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 545.751 versus 90.839
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 versus 3501
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3689
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3335
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 versus 3501
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3689
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3335
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 versus 10 December 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 574 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 448 |
Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 2988 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 versus 2704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 versus 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 versus 9850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 versus 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 versus 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 versus 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 versus 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 versus 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 versus 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 204 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.891 versus 31.471
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 versus 31.471 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | 2704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 455 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 | 9850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Nom de code | GP102 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 | 10 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,999 | $4,399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 204 | 769 |
Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | $332.21 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | 12.86 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 574 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 448 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 204 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 6 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 143.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |