NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
• Around 85% better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 6612 MHz
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 11768
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 39510
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 12.895
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 13738
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 13738

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 194.277
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 vs 1916.09
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 31.471
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 768.171 vs 545.751

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15451 11768
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	725 722
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	63932 39510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.277 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1916.09 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.951 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.471 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	545.751 768.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20035 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20035 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3356

Compare specifications (specs)