NVIDIA Quadro P6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P6000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 988 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1645 MHz versus 1114 MHz
- Environ 85% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 394.8 GTexel / s versus 213.9 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 3072
- Environ 85% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,634 gflops versus 6,844 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 36% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 versus 11768
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 versus 39510
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 versus 12.895
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 versus 13738
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 versus 13738
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 versus 21 March 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 988 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz versus 1114 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s versus 213.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 3072 |
Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops versus 6,844 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 12 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 versus 11768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 versus 722 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 versus 39510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 versus 12.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 versus 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 versus 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 versus 194.277
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 versus 1916.09
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 versus 31.471
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 768.171 versus 545.751
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 versus 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 versus 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 versus 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 versus 545.751 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | 11768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | 722 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 | 39510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | 207.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | 2593.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | 12.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | 145.003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | 768.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP102 | GM200 |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 | 21 March 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,999 | $4,199.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 204 | 251 |
Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | $2,825 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | 4.69 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 988 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3072 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 8,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 317.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |