NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2052.7x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 454
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 8734
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 34303
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 12948
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 12948
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 vs 8734 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 vs 34303 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 454 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 | 8734 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 | 34303 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 249 | 335 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1476 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1328 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 168.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
IntelArc Pro A50
