AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 versus AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 390 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 160.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 versus 8928
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53429 versus 44120
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 versus 120.267
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 versus 11.097
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 versus 607.381
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 versus 10445
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 versus 3708
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3353
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 versus 10445
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 versus 3708
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 2560 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 versus 8928 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53429 versus 44120 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 versus 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 versus 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 versus 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 versus 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 versus 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390
- 45.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 275 Watt versus 12500 million
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 versus 784
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 versus 3063.269
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 versus 784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 versus 3063.269 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 8928 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53429 | 44120 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3164.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3957 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Greenland | Grenada |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 228 | 296 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,120 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 275 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 512 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
