Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 versus 26.532
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 versus 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 48
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 versus 1739
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 versus 363
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11325 versus 7345
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 37.109
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 465.116
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 2.796
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 54.932
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 2780
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 1884
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 2780
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 1884
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1265 versus 619
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3904 versus 1739 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 512 versus 363 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11325 versus 7345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 37.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 465.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 1884 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1265 versus 619 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 3904 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 512 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7345 | 11325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 1265 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1044 | 704 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
