Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 10.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 152 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 16.451
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 versus 1.925
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 versus 17.065
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 versus 46.591
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 versus 2602
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3316
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 versus 2602
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3316
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 23 February 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 152 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 16.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 versus 1.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 versus 17.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 versus 46.591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 versus 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 versus 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3316 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Environ 71% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 513 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 7.3x plus de pipelines: 352 versus 48
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1932 versus 1739
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 versus 363
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7468 versus 7345
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 versus 465.116
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3104 versus 1884
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3104 versus 1884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 513 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 352 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1932 versus 1739 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 versus 363 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7468 versus 7345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 511.131 versus 465.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3104 versus 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3104 versus 1884 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 1932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7345 | 7468 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 16.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 511.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 1.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 17.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 46.591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3316 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 23 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1044 | 978 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $268 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 513 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 352 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 152 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 722.3 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.57 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2560 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
