NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 40 nm versus 65 nm
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 182 Watt
- Environ 14% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1 GB versus 896 MB
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 999 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 versus 54
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3342
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3342
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 16 June 2008 |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm versus 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 182 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 896 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 999 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 versus 54 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3342 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 88% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 476.9 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1217 versus 538
- 8.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19512 versus 2406
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.664 versus 5.055
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 477.327 versus 215.004
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.906 versus 10.393
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.525 versus 19.903
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 476.9 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1217 versus 538 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 versus 2406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 versus 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 versus 215.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 versus 10.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 versus 19.903 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 | 1217 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 54 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2406 | 19512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | 8.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | 477.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | 24.906 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | 29.525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GT200 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 16 June 2008 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1401 | 1404 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
| Prix maintenant | $95.38 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 476.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 182 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,400 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1242 MHz | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.9 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 896 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 111.9 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 448 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
ATIFirePro V3800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
