NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 438.4 GTexel / s
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 versus 73.167
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3360
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3360
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 21 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 versus 73.167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3360 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1530 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- 5x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1024
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1752 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 versus 7568
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 versus 389
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 180318 versus 41946
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 151.899
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 1844.67
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 10.683
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 versus 644.054
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 versus 12180
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 versus 12180
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1530 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 versus 7568 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 versus 389 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180318 versus 41946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 151.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 1844.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 10.683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 versus 644.054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 versus 12180 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7568 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | 180318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 500.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 7209.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 41.826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 273 | 135 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
