NVIDIA Quadro K2000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
Environ 34% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.53 GTexel / s versus 22.7 billion / sec
Environ 35% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 732.7 gflops versus 544.5 gflops
2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1580 versus 935
2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 versus 160
Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 versus 2673
Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.332 versus 8.493
Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 versus 0.863
2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.219 versus 19.116
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 versus 1913
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 versus 1913

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 March 2013 versus 1 October 2012
Taux de remplissage de la texture	30.53 GTexel / s versus 22.7 billion / sec
Performance á point flottant	732.7 gflops versus 544.5 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1580 versus 935
PassMark - G2D Mark	384 versus 160
Geekbench - OpenCL	4071 versus 2673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.332 versus 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.093 versus 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.219 versus 19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2446 versus 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2446 versus 1913

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Environ 59% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 51 Watt
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.42 versus 265.424
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.242 versus 15.009
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 1631
Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 1974
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 1631
Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 1974

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt versus 51 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	285.42 versus 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	17.242 versus 15.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3670 versus 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3341 versus 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3670 versus 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3341 versus 1974

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1580

935

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

384

160

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4071

2673

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.332

8.493

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

265.424

285.42

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.093

0.863

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.009

17.242

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.219

19.116

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2446

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3670

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1974

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2446

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3670

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1974

3341

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K2000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1580	935
PassMark - G2D Mark	384	160
Geekbench - OpenCL	4071	2673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.332	8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	265.424	285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.093	0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.009	17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.219	19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2446	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1631	3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1974	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2446	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1631	3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1974	3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K2000	NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK107	GK107
Date de sortie	1 March 2013	1 October 2012
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$599
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1212	1214
Prix maintenant	$164.99
Genre	Workstation	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	11.74
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	954 MHz
Performance á point flottant	732.7 gflops	544.5 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	30.53 GTexel / s	22.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt	32 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,270 million	1,270 million
Noyaux CUDA		384
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	202 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	64 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128bit
Vitesse de mémoire	4000 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus