NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1190 MHz
Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
4.4x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8762 vs 6573
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34300 vs 27133
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 8931
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 8931

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1328 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Boost clock speed	1476 MHz vs 1190 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8762 vs 6573
Geekbench - OpenCL	34300 vs 27133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
Around 18% better floating-point performance: 3,656 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 453

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	3,656 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	774 vs 453

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8762

6573

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

453

774

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

34300

27133

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12948

8931

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12948

8931

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3351

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark	8762	6573
PassMark - G2D Mark	453	774
Geekbench - OpenCL	34300	27133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948	8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948	8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	2911

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Code name	GP104	Polaris 22
Launch date	21 February 2018	1 February 2018
Place in performance rating	336	334
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1476 MHz	1190 MHz
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	1063 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,098 gflops	3,656 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	1280	1536
Texture fill rate	96.8 GTexel / s	114.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB / s	204.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Shared memory		0